Citigroup pushes at the limits to foreign ownership in Chinese
banks
IN A manoeuvre sure to incite the envy of its peers, Citigroup is
poised to become the first foreign bank, and only the second
foreign investor, to gain control of a Chinese lender. The American
financial-services giant is leading a consortium that has bid some
24 billion yuan ($3 billion) for an 85% stake in Guangdong
Development Bank (GDB), a medium-sized bank from China's relatively
rich south. Citigroup itself could own 40-45% of GDB if the deal
proceeds, making a mockery of rules limiting a single foreign
investor in a Chinese bank to 20% and all foreigners to 25%.
This would be a comeback for Citigroup, which for two years has
had to sit and watch while rivals have grabbed strategic positions
in the Chinese
banking market. In June 2005 Bank
of America (BofA) beat Citigroup to a 9% stake in China
Construction Bank (CCB), one of the country's four biggest lenders.
Citigroup even lost a profitable position advising on CCB's
multi-billion-dollar flotation. This time it has moved faster,
outbidding ABN Amro, of the Netherlands, and France's Société
Générale for GDB. Although Newbridge Capital, a private-equity
firm, was the first foreign investor to gain management control of
a Chinese bank, its charge, Shenzhen Development Bank, is barely
half the size of GDB, which had assets of 345 billion yuan at the
end of 2004.
Citigroup is, however, paying a high price: 2.3 times book value,
compared with the 1.15 times BofA paid for its slice of CCB. True,
acquirers often pay a premium for control. But GDB's financial
state is precarious. Its liabilities exceed its assets by 35
billion yuan (state subsidies have propped it up); its
capital-adequacy ratio is way below international standards; and
its profitability is poor.
Moreover, to proceed with the deal Citigroup is being forced to
restructure another, and at a price. In early 2003 the Americans
bought 4.6% of Shanghai Pudong Development Bank, a middle-sized
lender that insiders say is proving a prickly partner. Citigroup
promised then not to invest in another mainland bank without
Shanghai Pudong's permission. That has been granted, but only on
condition that Citigroup raise its stake in the Shanghai bank to
19.9% at a rumoured cost of $800m, four times the original price
per share. Remarkably, Citigroup also had to agree not to set up a
joint-venture with GDB in credit cards, China's most promising
financial
business and the only one the
Guangdong bank appears to be any good at.
Still, Citigroup's rivals will surely cry foul. By last October,
22 foreign banks had spent $16.5 billion on stakes in 17 mainland
lenders, but had gained little real influence. The Chinese
authorities will argue that GDB's poor state and smallish size make
it an exception. And Liu Mingkang, the
banking regulator, gave
warning last month that should foreigners be granted more than a
quarter of a Chinese bank, that bank would then be considered
foreign, subject to restrictions that, among other things, allow
yuan-denominated business in only a few cities. Still, he will now
come under pressure to raise the caps on foreigners' stakes. That
might allow the likes of HSBC, with 19.9% in BoCom, a larger and
far sounder bank than GDB, to gain real management control.
Inadvertently, Citigroup's coup may end up profiting its rivals
more than itself.
Visit to find free ebook
http://www.ebooks-lib.com
Romatic clip
http://www.iloveher.info/
love/love.php
Movie online
http://www.d2pgroup.com
[ Comment, Edit or Article Submission ]